Showing posts with label Protest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Protest. Show all posts

Friday, November 29, 2013

Imran Khan - Pakistan's agitator for idiocy

Imran Khan should have stuck to cricket. The Pakistani political party, PTI (Movement for Justice), has reportedly leaked the name of the CIA's Station Chief in Islamabad. For the interests of the Pakistani people, this was a profoundly idiotic move. 

First, even before now, the Station Chief's identity was almost certainly known to the Pakistani authorities - one of the primary responsibilities of a Station Chief is to liaise with the foreign government. The PTI hasn't helped the Pakistani Government uncover a foreign spy. But via this leak (if only for a short time), the PTI will have weakened Pakistani-US intelligence cooperation. This is not a small concern. The US-Pakistani intelligence relationship is of great importance to the people of Pakistan. In specific terms, it's instrumental to Pakistan's ability to keep innocent civilians safe from violent extremists.

That incontestable reality speaks to a deeper truth. 

This leak was about one thing - domestic politics. Over the last couple of years, Khan has cultivated a seriously unpleasant alliance with various Islamist extremist groups. At the same time, the PTI leader has sought to blame the United States for Pakistan's woeful security situation. This all culminated with Khan's rally last week against the CIA's drone program (an issue he has embraced as his defining populist cause). To be sure, many Pakistanis do not like the idea of a foreign power using force in their country. Nevertheless, as I've argued before, US drones help Pakistan to address critical threats that would otherwise go unchallenged.

Ultimately, Khan's actions speak to a broader problem in much of the Islamic world. Rather than facing up to major socio-political difficulties, far too many politicians choose to blame the United States for their nation's ills. It's certainly easier than confronting brutal extremist movements. In the short term, it also offers voters a rallying point to express their diverging discontent in common cause. Yet, the problem with this type of political strategy is that it renders such negative consequences - sacrificing the interests of the people at the altar of a patently false agenda. Take this example from a senior PTI politician. After calling for the CIA Station Chief's arrest, the MP also called for his ''interrogation'' in order to garner the identities of drone pilots. It's absurdity personified. Mazari knows that will never happen, she's simply stoking the fires of an easy anger. 

Khan and the PTI aren't helping to build a better, independent future for Pakistan. Instead, they're simply fueling extremists who want to destroy any semblance of hope for a more just and prosperous democracy.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

EDL Protest - Analysis

Yesterday in London, the Metropolitan Police arrested approximately 165 individuals on suspicion of public order related offenses. The trouble occurred during a protest march by the English Defense League (EDL).

I have a number of thoughts.

UK Speech Laws are Counter-Productive
The latest arrest of the EDL's leader, Tommy Robinson, will only empower him further. As is the case in much of Europe, the UK's speech laws are overly broad and unjustifiably destructive of individual rights to free expression. These laws are also fundamentally counterproductive to the cause of tolerance. Consider Tommy Robinson. A PR savvy guy; whether staging 'unjust' arrests for propaganda purposes (see view count on 'unjust' link), or adeptly shifting his style for different audiences - supporters and doubters, Robinson manipulates the law to his own advantage. Even if indirectly, Robinson has used British speech laws to portray himself as a crusading patriot for freedom (note EDL imagery - see point (3)).

The Metropolitan Police have refined their public order capabilities/strategy
It's hard to overstate the difficulty of policing EDL protests. This effort involves three distinct challenges. For a start, the Police must deal with groups of angry (often intoxicated) individuals in a manner that protects the public. Second, the Police must ensure protesters are able to exercise their democratic rights to protest. Third, the Police must manage the protection of the protesters. This third point is crucial. Here, the Police are forced to address violent counter-protests, as well as serious counter-terrorism concerns. Evidenced by the June 2012 Dewsbury plot, the EDL has become a target for Islamic extremists. In cumulative terms, these challenges mean that British Police forces must apply diverse and resource intensive efforts towards the security of short duration and comparatively small protests. Fortunately, by the standard of yesterday's security operation, the Metropolitan Police are doing fine work.

Americans must not fall for the EDL's BS
Look, I'm the first to suggest that many Islamic rooted societies face serious challenges. Nevertheless, this doesn't mean that we should resort to prejudice against Muslims. At present, casual anti-Islamic sentiment finds far too much sympathy in our society. 

It's crucial that whenever he pops up in US media, Tommy Robinson be judged with objective scrutiny. In the end, Robinson is a thug.



Thursday, November 17, 2011

NYC Protest

Throwing acid at cops- sure fire way to alienate public support. Some people in this movement are so f%%%ing stupid.